 | Mark,<br />I appreciate the tenacity with which you put forth your point of view. Especially the state of things and the seeming recklessness of society in general. Gulf toxicity, drug toxicity,etc.<br />and you are allowed to have your opinion about MMS. However I expected that you would speak to your experience with the compound and not cast aspersions or make character assessments of the originator, Jim Humble. If all you have is, he is an embarrasment to the health field or he is a Bishop in his own church (what kind of church can that be...) then you are just saying the same thing about him that others in the health field say about you. You minimize the man in hopes of minimizing or destroying the protocol. I have been a user of his chlorine dioxide discovery for over 2 years and have found it to be effective and consistent. You are a bit conflicted and my sense would be that you have more problems with the religious fervor of his followers than the protocol itself. I used it for jock itch and athletes foot. My assumption, which I got through much investigation, was that these fungal sites were only outward manifestations of a overburdened inward condition of too much fungus. It got rid of my problem after using it for 7 days. I do believe that with a profound nutritional protocol, I could have gotten rid of it. So I believe that in my case it was shock therapy. I know you understand shock therapy so I guess you can understand this shock therapy. I have been able to control my external fungus problems by using an intermittent therapy of MMS. So until I have the courage of following my ideal nutritional protocol, I will use this as intermittent therapy. Is it chemotherapy? Yes I believe it is. Has it killed anyone? That is yet to be determined. Based on the number of people who have found therapeutic results from using it, I would say that chlorine dioxide is WAY ahead of pharmaceuticals in efficacy., peng joon, >:[,
| |
搜狗热心用户
发表于 2012-9-27 08:26:35
匿名卡
显身卡